Exurban Change Program - EX-4

Urbanization trends in Ohio: 
tracking Ohio's urban growth and land use change

Prepared by:
Elena Irwin and Jason Reece (August 2002)

REPORT SUMMARY 

Ohio is among the most urban and fastest urbanizing states in the nation.  In 1997, Ohio ranked seventh among all states in total acres of developed land and ranked among the top ten fastest urbanizing states between 1992 and 1997.  Despite fast rates of urbanization in the 1990's, Ohio witnessed only modest gains in population during this same time period. These trends have led to an increased amount of low-density development, an increase in exurban areas of the state, and a substantial loss of rural land. 

Urbanization rates are much more closely tied to rates of farmland loss in and around metropolitan areas than they are in the more rural areas of the state. This suggests that urbanization is a driving force of farmland loss in and nearby metropolitan areas, but is not a major cause of farmland loss in more rural areas of the state. 

Along with the increase in low-density development in exurban areas, Ohio's metropolitan areas have become less dense over time.  Between 1992 and 1997, metropolitan areas added urban land at a rate that is more than double the rate of their population growth, leading to a deconcentration of population in Ohio's metropolitan regions.  

Overall, these trends point to a pattern of urban growth in Ohio that has become increasingly spread out and "sprawling" over time. This pattern of growth has implications for the local communities and residents.  Residents seeking lower density development and a more rural living environment benefit by being able to purchase larger lots in exurban areas, but the resulting dispersed pattern of growth increases the costs of providing community services; contributes to the spatial mismatch between the supply and demand of roads, public utilities, and other infrastructure; and hastens the loss of open space in rural areas.  Policies should incorporate these added community costs into the private costs of new development and should seek to manage growth by balancing the costs and benefits of this type of growth pattern.

NOTE: ALL FILES IN ADOBE ACROBAT (PDF) FORMAT

ACCOMPANYING GRAPHICS:

Section 1: Land Use Change in Ohio

Section 2: Urbanization Trends in Ohio, 1982-1997

Section 3: Patterns of Low Density Development in Ohio

Appendix C: County Reference Map

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e: exurban@osu.edu; p: 614.247.6479; f: 614.292.0078
m: Exurban Change Program, Dept. of Agricultural, Environmental, & Development Econ.
103 Agricultural Administration Bldg., 2120 Fyffe Rd., Columbus, Ohio  43210  USA